|
|
Posted By Administration,
Tuesday, September 16, 2025
|
As this month is an opportunity for many new conversations, today’s post introduces communication tactic #2 for your ASP/Bar guru toolbox.
It is easy to vent about our workload, ample student meetings, or perhaps disappointment about an institutional decision. It is much harder to stay positive, remain open and let colleagues see the real you; a genuine, devoted, caring and diligent campus member.
Even more so, it is ten times harder for new law students to confidently walk through your office door three weeks into law school reality. Thus, communication tactic #2 is a refresher on the use of probative, open ended questions to break the ice with your students and fellow colleagues.
I recently reviewed several professional development pieces regarding conversation starters. I found myself aghast at the amount of closed ended questions on these lists. For example, "Have you been here before?" "Will you come back to this conference again next year?" Or "Do you have plans while you're in town?"
I don't know about you, but if someone I didn't know walked up to me and this was their opener, it would be a short yes/no conversation.
Reading these pieces made me think more about the importance of using probative questions as conversation starters in our work.
Probative open-ended questions illicit more information than we would receive when we ask narrowly tailored, yes/no questions. The question style begins with a "who, what, when, where, or why" phrase which permits the listener to give a narrative response. Our advocacy skills know this information to be true, but our consistent execution of probative questions may need some sharpening given the daily hustle and shuffle between meetings.
For a new student meeting, instead of opening with a statement like "Tell me about yourself" (which can put someone in a defensive, closed position) try "What can I tell you to help you on your journey?" This opens up the channels for communication and may establish trust.
When speaking with a colleague, instead of pleasantries and the usual "How is it going?" (which often results in a mediocre response) try pleasantries and a unique question like "What fun or interesting article have you read lately?" (And be ready with an article of your own – maybe even a shout out to our blog too!)
People will get to know the real (amazing ASP/Bar) you when you make a conscious effort to get to know them. Here is a short list to get you started with new students:
"What can I tell you about law school that might help you?"
"What is one 'win' that you achieved or hope to achieve this week?"
"What would you like to know about me?"
"What is something that you want to share about your experience with me?"
"Where are you on your journey through law school?"
… and of course, humor often works well but I'll leave that advice to editor, Liz Stillman ;)
(Amy Vaughan-Thomas)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Tuesday, September 16, 2025
|
The University of Dayton School of Law invites applications for one Assistant Professor of Lawyering Skills. This is a non-tenure track position with an initial appointment of one year and the possibility of renewal for long-term (three or five-year) appointments after three years of satisfactory service.
The faculty member would join a team of experienced full-time faculty members who make up the School of Law’s nationally recognized Legal Profession Program. The focus of the Legal Profession Program at the University of Dayton School of Law is to help students develop essential lawyering skills. The Program is a broad two-semester six-credit-hour sequence during a student’s first year at the School of Law. These courses, called Legal Profession I and Legal Profession II, are devoted to building the legal research, analysis, and writing skills used in today's law practice. The courses also emphasize the development of cultural humility and competency, professionalism, and ethics. Classes meet in small groups led by experienced full-time faculty who are at the forefront of trends in legal writing and research. Responsibilities of the Assistant Professor of Lawyering Skills will include:
● Teaching Legal Profession I and II, and other legal research and writing courses related to legal reasoning and critical reading;
● Providing service to the School of Law and the University, and
● Participating in the larger community for legal research and writing professionals through regular attendance or presentations at conferences and other relevant endeavors to support the faculty member’s professional development.
UD is one of the nation’s largest Catholic universities, and the largest private university in Ohio. Embedded in the dynamic city of Dayton, OH, and grounded in its Catholic, Marianist tradition, UD provides education to develop the whole student and is committed to experiential learning.
Minimum Qualifications
-
A J.D. degree from an ABA-accredited law school;
-
Articulable commitment to the field of legal research and writing, including implementing the best models and practices available to teach legal research and writing and utilizing recent developments in pedagogy in law schools in the United States;
-
Prior legal practice experience in the United States; and
-
Excellent written communication skills.
Preferred Qualifications
While not everyone may meet all preferred qualifications, the ideal candidate will bring many of the following:
-
Recent successful experience in legal research and writing teaching, including implementing best models and practices available to teach legal research and writing and utilizing recent developments in pedagogy in law schools in the United States;
-
Successful experience in any or all of the following:
-
participating and teaching in online education;
-
working independently and collaboratively;
-
effectively engaging, teaching, and mentoring students of socially and culturally diverse backgrounds
-
Demonstrable commitment to socially and culturally diverse communities;
-
Expressed willingness to engage with Catholic and Marianist educational values including educating the whole person and a commitment of service to the community, university and profession
-
Law school achievements and accomplishments, such as high academic achievement, law review, moot court, and/or mock trial;
-
Effective presentation skills;
-
Effective interpersonal communication skills;
-
Effective oral communication skills; and
- Effective classroom management skills
Required Documents
- Cover Letter that addresses all of the minimum and any preferred qualifications met
- Curriculum Vitae
- A document describing your commitment to legal research and writing, including implementing the best models and practices available to teach legal research and writing and utilizing recent developments in pedagogy in law schools in the United States.
Applicants must be currently authorized to work in the United States on a full-time basis. The University does not provide work visa sponsorship for this position
Posting closes November 1, 2025 at 11:55 PM EST
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Monday, September 8, 2025
|
This is the season of waiting. The bar exam is in the rear-view for our graduates, but results are still weeks away for some, and many are stepping into their first post-graduate roles.
Like many of you, I’ve felt great pride watching our graduates announce new professional roles on LinkedIn or other social media accounts. Their achievements are extraordinary and absolutely worth celebrating. Securing that first job after law school is a tremendous milestone, and is something grads should share with family, friends, and professional networks.
But alongside the celebrations comes an important reminder we can help them navigate – how graduates describe their roles publicly, especially online, matters.
A graduate may have accepted a position as an associate attorney, but until they are formally admitted to practice law, they are not yet an attorney. The distinction feels technical, and even nit-picky, but it carries real professional consequences. Announcements of these accomplishments should be phrased in a way that avoids misrepresentation.
Character and Fitness committees in several jurisdictions have flagged applicants for presenting themselves prematurely as “attorneys” or “associate attorneys.” Even an innocent LinkedIn update can create complications, delays, or in some cases sanctions (for example, California has sanctioned individuals for prematurely using “attorney,” “lawyer,” or “Esq.”).
Words carry weight in the legal profession. Accuracy and transparency are not just ideals, they are ethical requirements. The way a grad phrases their job title while awaiting bar results reflects on their integrity, judgment, and professionalism.
Fortunately, the solution is simple. Graduates can (and should) highlight their success while being accurate and transparent. For example, phrasing like “Associate (bar admission pending)” or another approved variation is both celebratory and compliant.
Here are examples of phrasing some jurisdictions note as acceptable:
California, D.C., Florida, Georgia, Illinois, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Washington – “awaiting swearing-in,” “bar candidate,” “JD,” “Juris Doctor,” “pending admission.”
Massachusetts and New York – “awaiting admission,” “pending admission,” “law school graduate,” “JD,” or “Juris Doctor.”
Tennessee and Texas – “awaiting admission,” “pending swearing-in,” “law school graduate,” “JD,” “Juris Doctor,” or “bar candidate.”
These phrases celebrate achievement, maintain transparency, and protect graduates’ professional reputations while they await admission.
A quick caveat about the phrases – graduates should always confirm directly with their jurisdiction’s admissions office. That is the #1 way to ensure compliance with their jurisdictions’ rules!
Here are some key take-aways to share with your grads:
- Use accurate, clear language to describe your status while awaiting admission.
- Update online profiles carefully, avoiding any implication you are already licensed if you are not.
- Check directly with your jurisdiction’s admissions office for the most reliable guidance.
- Seek advice when unsure—from career services, bar support offices, or admissions staff.
- Be patient as you prepare for your swearing-in. It’s a milestone worth celebrating, and doing so with professionalism will enhance your reputation as you begin your career.
(Guest blogger: Michele Berger, Visiting Assistant Professor of Academic Success and Bar Support, Albany Law School)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Monday, September 8, 2025
|
Starting a new school year, so many students are eager to learn and try everything to make themselves a successful law student. However, for some students, significant adjustments to the learning processes they developed in their previous education settings can disrupt legal learning to their detriment. This can be true for some neurodivergent law students.
The world is made with neurotypical people in mind—much like it is for able-bodied persons. As a response to this, neurodivergent individuals (i.e., those whose brains work differently because of conditions such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (autism), or those with anxiety)[1] often develop conscious and unconscious processes to adapt themselves to the world.
Bringing it back to legal education, neurodivergent law students likely developed learning processes in undergrad that helped make them successful. However, upon entering law school and hearing how to “best read and brief cases” or how to “outline well,” neurodivergent law students may think they need to completely change their process, but that is an incorrect assumption. Learning as a neurodivergent law student requires a certain amount of adaptation to traditional legal pedagogical tools while also remaining true to the previously developed processes that led to their success.[2]
For example, as an (underdiagnosed) neurodivergent undergraduate student, I created “study guides” for each of my undergraduate exams. These covered the necessary vocabulary, the information discussed in class or in slides, and the connections that tied these together. These turned into case-heavy outlines my first year of law school, and I learned to adapt over the next year to focus more on the law rather than the details of cases--mostly through trial and error on exams.
This story is not unique to me. I have found that other neurodivergent students I work with in academic and bar success have also developed their own learning processes. Some prefer long paragraphs that helps them to map out the language before having to write it out on an exam, so we adapt outlining to process the law and case examples in this way. Other students have preferred more concise or visual formats like PowerPoints and charts, so we adapt their learning strategies to match the processes they used previously. This has come up most often in learning to outline, which is of course how a student processes the law to better understand it for test day.
The processes neurodivergent law students have developed may already be strong and support their learning needs, but the content may need additional support. For example, they may need to learn to switch from details to the big pictures of the law (e.g., pivot from case details to key rule takeaways) or to build in more connections between concepts. For other neurodivergent law students who try to completely convert to “tried and true” law school methods, they may face challenges with understanding how to use the new tool when it is not how they prefer to learn. So, instead of constraining those students to change their study process to match legal learning methods, work with them to adapt their previous processes to match their new learning goals.
Below are two ways you can support neurodivergent law students as they adjust to learning the law:
- If you work in the classroom, before you start teaching “how to” perform a specific study task, poll the students: “What worked well for you in undergrad?” Create a discussion around the topic and allow students to share the positive ways they previously learned. Then as you teach new methods specific to law school, ask students for adaptations to their previous learning processes that will now support their legal education goals. This will support not only your neurodivergent law students, but also likely some of your neurotypical law students.
- If you work individually with a student who discloses to you that they are neurodivergent, ask them to show you how they are trying to process the law (e.g., a case brief, their notes, their outline). As they do, probe them with questions about how this is similar or different to what they did as an undergraduate student. If they are veering significantly from what they used to do (and facing challenge as a result), ask them if there is a reason, and if they are changing just because that’s how it was taught at Orientation or in a skills course. Then, work with them to merge the processes. Some neurodivergent law students may not have had to study much (or at all) in undergrad, so this is also a good way to determine how to best support their learning as they try true studying for the first time.
As more adults discover that they are neurodivergent, legal educators can continue to familiarize themselves with neurodiversity and better support students struggling to adapt their processes to legal education. Neurodivergent students know what helps them to be successful because they understand themselves more than you (or even they) may know.
(Erica M. Lux)
[1] Neurodivergent, Cleveland Clinic, https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/symptoms/23154-neurodivergent (last visited Sept. 3, 2025).
[2] Hailey Hillsman, Succeed in Law School as a Neurodivergent Student, Thomson Reuters Law School Survival Guide, https://lawschool.thomsonreuters.com/survival-guide/neurodiversity-resources/ (last visited Sept. 3, 2025) (discussing how neurodivergent law students can try new study methods but should also trust their study methods because they have been in school long enough to know what works for them).
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Monday, September 8, 2025
|
“Happy 'start' to your fall semester!” For many in our industry, hearing refreshed colleagues say these words makes us feel like the fall is anything but a “start.” I prefer to imagine our work more like taking intermittent water breaks during the calendar year marathon.
The fall semester brings with it a myriad of conversations during meetings, classroom lectures, and introductions to new faces. In today’s era, meeting someone new, let alone speaking to them, is “as they say” – “Cringe!”
Here is a tip for your toolbox, “say less.” But how? We are constantly called upon to answer questions from administrators, faculty, staff and students regarding our expertise.
How can one advocate for additional resources and strengthen institutional alliances without saying more? Extroverts feel the need to fill the silence and often provide immediate response. Introverts feel their internal advocate pushed and pulled to speak up, speak out, pitch in and provide the answers despite their personal discomfort.
But we sometimes forget that our best advocacy tool is the ability to listen, learn, and reflect. Yes – in fact, “say less.”
“Saying less” doesn’t mean saying nothing. It means choosing reservation in your communication. It means intentionally asking open-ended questions and actively listening to the responses. It means sitting with information, even when the speaker frustrates or disappoints you. This approach buys you time to reflect, strategize, and select your next steps and often yields stronger results.
You do not need to be the fastest person in this race, you simply need to improve your own pace. So welcome back to the marathon and whether you be in a lecture, in a meeting, or talking to yourself (we all do it)… “say less.”
(Amy Vaughan-Thomas)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Monday, September 8, 2025
|
When my kids were younger and would order a burger and fries, they would immediately go for the fries. They had already grabbed the ketchup upon ordering and were ready. They understood that the burger should be eaten as well, but the fries were the prize and kids ate them first. As “responsible adults,” we tend to now go for the protein before the fat and salt. The fries are earned.
This morning, I was having a meeting with a student who is on academic warning and probation. At our school, academic warning is good academic standing but with a GPA that merits some intervention ahead of the bar exam. However, academic probation is not good academic standing and is a status only our academic standing committee can confer. Our committee will usually place a student on both since warning triggers a series of required bar topic classes in addition to the probation criteria.
This student had registered for 13 credits this fall and an internship. However, due to the academic warning label, had to add our required 2 credit course, bringing her to 15 credits and a job. They asked me if was too much-and I agreed that it was. We agreed that dropping the internship would rob them of both a good credential and experience that isn’t formatted or assessed like law school (always a bonus for folks on the academic tightrope). The issue came down to dropping either professional responsibility or entertainment law.
Entertainment law is a small class taught only in the fall by one valued adjunct. I was surprised that a first semester 2L even got into the class as it is usually full after a few hours of registration. Conversely, prof. resp. is taught in multiple sections every semester (and the summer) by a variety of amazing folks here. Prof. resp. is required, but entertainment law is fun.
And students who are placed in these categories of academic distress feel like they shouldn’t have fun. They made promises to the academic standing committee about future success and responsibility and therefore seem to feel that every class they take has to be one that is required. The asked for mercy and feel that since it was meted out, they must never do anything other than stay on a prescribed path. I get that. I think I would do the same--put my head down, done what was asked, and just grinded through the rest of law school. I would have felt that I didn’t deserve fun.
But I would have been wrong. Law school may be the last chance a student will have to learn some seemingly superfluous content from an expert in that field. Education for the sake of learning rather than career is a rare commodity after law school. Since the profession of law does require (in most jurisdictions) some lifelong learning about your area of practice, why not take some time to reignite a love of learning while still in law school? I don’t regret taking classes in law school that weren’t on the bar, or relevant to my practice or career. I loved my law school bioethics class. It was fascinating even if it wasn’t something I even thought to pursue before, during, or after taking the course.
So, I asked my student the question. Ultimately, they would have to be comfortable with the choice they made in a place that I can imagine is not comfortable these days. I asked them if they ate the burger or the fries first and why. I told them that I was a burger first kind of person, and to me fries are the prize. But I told also them that the option to eat the fries first may not be on the table as they move forward in their careers, so why not embrace it now?
I did not ask for their final answer-and we didn’t need to because there is a little time left in our add/drop period. But I left them with a framework for thinking about the options: frequency of course offering, quality faculty, scheduled MPRE seatings, and the joy of having a class where doing the reading never seems like work.
Students in academic distress deserve to have their fries and eat them too.
(Liz Stillman)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Friday, August 29, 2025
|
No, “BTS” Season here does not refer to the comeback season of the K-pop sensation BTS.[1] Instead, it is an acronym we used in my test prep days for the “Back to School” season: the chaotic start of the year where we got on campus, met as many students as we could, talked to every student organization on campus at their first meetings about our products, and tried to steer students on the path towards their graduate and professional school success.
Now, as a legal educator many of those tasks are replaced with Orientation workshops, teaching new courses, and generally being present and visible at various happenings around campus to ensure students feel supported and remember the resources our academic success teams offer—while also scheduling all that around individual student meetings. Plus, this busy period comes right after the bar prep season—arguably one of our more stressful and demanding times of year as academic and bar success professionals.
As we prioritize our students over the summer and at the start of the academic year, many of us can forget to take care of ourselves and nourish our professional goals. So how can we equally prioritize our wellness and professional goals during the chaotic “BTS” season? Here are three tips for new and returning academic & bar success professionals:
- Schedule Your Time Before You Open Up Your Calendar. To ensure that we get time to recover between meetings or that we are able to focus on administrative, scholarly, and/or teaching priorities, carve that time out of your calendar first. We are often tempted to first put our obligations onto our calendar, rather than thinking about what we need to thrive. Just as I teach my students to add in their “joy” before they add in all their study times to their calendar, I do the same for myself—and now I encourage you to do the same. Schedule your joy or professional priorities, then open up your calendar for the many other tasks you have.
- Categorize Time Depending on Tasks You Need to Complete. Some of us find it difficult to transition from writing, to teaching, to admin, back to teaching, to admin (rinse and repeat). Instead, I recommend blocking or categorizing time on your calendar so that you know “Tuesdays are for Administrative Tasks” or “Mornings are for Writing.” This will allow you to better focus on the tasks you need to complete, rather than constantly switching gears and losing momentum through the day. Cognitive flexibility is an important higher-order processing skill, but you don’t have to do mental gymnastics.
- Create Boundaries to Prevent Burnout. Many of us likely take work home with us and that can be okay—to an extent. You are not a superhero, and no one expects you to do everything. So, create some boundaries around when you feel comfortable working from home and when you should just cut it out. I myself like to work from home for 2-3 nights during the week, only for a couple of extra hours. I find that once I am home, have had dinner, and spend some time with my fur babies, I can then work on my scholarship, another blog post, or grading. But I do not let this happen every night, nor over the weekends, which are dedicated “me time.” So, identify where you feel comfortable spending those few extra minutes or where you need to rest and recharge, and put them into your calendar. You may have to be flexible from week to week, depending on the week’s commitments but regrouping at the start of each week and setting your boundaries can help you meet the moments when you need to be on and when you can remain firm in staying ‘off.’
Whether you are new to academic & bar success or if you are a seasoned pro needing some reminders, use these tips to take care of you, your personal goals, and professional dreams while working hard for others at the start of this new academic year. Happy BTS!
(Erica M. Lux)
[1] K-pop group BTS is quite popular, though you may have recently heard about the Netflix animated film “K-Pop Demon Hunters” that has taken over charts and screens (which is partially inspired by BTS).
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Friday, August 29, 2025
|
Please welcome Shane Dizon as contributing editor of the blog. Shane will post his perspectives on Fridays and will regularly highlight ASP/Bar related scholarship, among other things. Shane Dizon is Senior Advisor in Instructional Design and Adjunct Professor at New York Law School. He has worked in academic and bar prep support for 15 years across 6 different law schools in a variety of capacities. Shane was the recipient of the AASE Guiding Light Award in 2019 “in recognition of the knowledge and experience he brings to new colleagues in a supportive, transparent, and intelligent way.” Since 2023, he has been Co-Organizer of the New York Academic Support Workshop, the oldest regional conference in the law school academic support and bar preparation community. A frequent presenter at ASP conferences, Shane is the keeper of the national dataset on ASP job postings (4 years running!) and is also currently working on a field-wide survey of NextGen institutional readiness. He’s the only ASPer working on Central European Time, in a place where they make this thing no one’s ever heard of called … paella. We look forward to reading his insights each week.
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Friday, August 29, 2025
|
Diversify the Modes of Engagement
As we all know, different students process information differently. A single workshop – no matter how good it is – will not serve everyone. Instead, try adopting a more comprehensive approach. For example, you might:
- Offer live workshops for students who learn best through discussion and real-time Q&A.
- Record and post short videos for students who prefer to pause, rewind, and review at their own pace.
- Provide written guides or checklists for those who need concrete, step-by-step instructions.
- Create interactive quizzes or self-check tools for students who learn best by doing.
Importantly, this isn’t about creating more work for educators. Instead, it’s about designing core materials that can live in multiple formats. While building this out will be more time-intensive than delivering one workshop, a diverse collection of resources will reach more students over time.
Anchor Online Resources to Human Connection
Online resources shine when they complement personal interaction. For instance, you might pair a self-guided outlining module with an invitation to meet for a short follow up appointment. Or you could encourage faculty to point students toward academic support videos or guides as reinforcement for necessary skills within their subject. When students see online resources as part of a broader relationship, they’re more likely to use them meaningfully.
Build for Accessibility and Flexibility
Hybrid support should increase access, not create new barriers. This means being thoughtful about the accessibility of resources. For instance, videos should be captioned and under 10 minutes. Try to make the resources mobile-friendly so students can engage between classes or during commutes. And, perhaps most importantly, post resources in a predictable, easy-to-find location (not five clicks deep in the LMS).
Flexibility is key: a student should be able to choose the format that works for them without losing the substance.
Create Feedback Loops to Evolve
The best hybrid models grow through iteration. Ask students:
- What format do you use most?
- What feels overwhelming or hard to find?
- What additional resources would have helped you this semester?
Quick polls, informal check-ins, or even an end-of-semester survey can guide small adjustments that make a big difference.
Hybrid support isn’t about doubling your workload or reinventing every wheel. It’s about layering accessibility and flexibility into what you already do so that the same core message reaches students in different ways. When we create hybrid support models with intention, we show students that there isn’t just one “right” way to learn – and that might be the most empowering lesson of all.
(Dayna Smith)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Friday, August 29, 2025
|
Joining us as a new Contributing Editor is Erica M. Lux from Texas Tech University School of Law. She will post primarily on Thursdays. Erica M. Lux serves as the Director for Academic Success Programs. She holds a B.A. from Texas Tech University and a J.D. from Texas Tech University School of Law. Erica M. Lux practiced private commercial litigation in Dallas, Texas prior to working in academic support. We look forward to reading all her contributions to this blog.
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Friday, August 29, 2025
|
Hot off the presses at West Academic is a new textbook that we can all use to develop and sharpen the legal methodology skills of our students. The book, Client-Centered Legal Analysis, centers students as advocates for their clients while building problem-solving skills associated with the practice of law and NextGen Uniform Bar exam. Each chapter pairs a foundational practice skill with legal doctrine to resolve a client matter using simulated client documents, e.g., transcripts, complaints, emails, etc. The book is organized into chapter exercises, designed to guide students through smaller tasks, that culminate in a final capstone exercise bringing together all the skills learned in previous chapters.
If you teach a second-year academic skills course, or want to point your faculty colleagues to a resource that is built around NextGen foundational skills, this book is for you! Client-Centered Legal Analysis is authored by two accomplished academic support program directors: Joni Wiredu (Howard University School of Law) and Steven Foster (Oklahoma City University School of Law).
(Guest blogger: Marsha Griggs, Associate Professor of Law, Saint Louis University School of Law)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Friday, August 29, 2025
|
I am delighted to announce that Amy Vaughan-Thomas from the University of Massachusetts will join us as a contributing editor. She will primarily post on Tuesdays. Amy Vaughan-Thomas joined the University of Massachusetts School of Law in 2018. She received her B.A. in Political Science and American Studies from the University of Connecticut in 2012. In 2016, she earned her J.D. from California Western School of Law. As a former Division 1 athlete, she values the importance of a "team first" mentality and appreciates being a member of the UMass Dartmouth community. We look forward to the contributions she will make to this blog.

This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Friday, August 29, 2025
|
I’m new to the world of Academic Support and Student Success. Though I’m just beginning this professional journey, I bring a unique perspective, having graduated from law school within the past five years.
During my time as a law student, I became familiar with the "everyone vs. me" culture that often permeates legal education. But what impacted me more deeply, and what I rarely heard others talk about, was the “me vs. me” mentality. So, let’s talk about it.
The "Me vs. Me" Mindset
This internal struggle is real for so many of our students. It's the voice inside that questions, criticizes, compares, and doubts, often more harshly than any external competition. It's rooted in perfectionism, pride, fear of failure, or all of the above. And it can cloud a student's judgment, undermine their confidence, and ultimately threaten their success.
Our role is to help students recognize when they are getting in their own way. Even when they can’t quite articulate the problem themselves, we can be a steady support system that helps them navigate through the fog.
So, How Do We Help?
- Create a Judgment-Free Zone. Our first responsibility is to hold space. A space where students can be honest, maybe for the first time, about how they’ve sabotaged their own success. Here, self-awareness becomes a superpower, not a source of shame. When students begin to unpack their habits, fears, and thought patterns, we listen without trying to immediately fix or reframe.
- Resist the Urge to Reassure, Right Away. It's tempting to respond with praise or affirmations: “You’re amazing!” or “You’ve got this!” While encouragement has its place, what students often need most is the time and space to see themselves clearly, both the struggle and the strength. Real growth happens when they begin to shift their own mindset, not just hear ours.
- Provide Tools and Accountability. Once awareness is on the table, we do what we always do: we support. We offer tangible strategies for class prep, exam readiness, and time management. We share tips for balancing academic demands with personal well-being. And we check in. Not just to track progress, but to make sure they’re not slipping back into old patterns of shrinking, hiding, or overworking to the point of burnout.
- Remind Them of Their Value. We remind our students that they were chosen, out of many, for a reason. Law school isn’t just a place they were accepted into; it’s a space that saw their potential and believed in their future. But they have to keep believing in themselves, too.
- Celebrate the Process, Not Just the Outcome. We help them set goals that aren’t just grade-driven, but growth-driven. We celebrate all wins, no matter how small. Each step forward is progress. Each self-aware moment is a victory. Each time they show up for themselves is a reason to cheer.
For the student battling the “me vs. me” mindset, academic success isn’t just about study strategies or GPA, it’s about learning to be on their own team. And for us, it’s about showing up with empathy, consistency, and tools that empower them to rewrite their inner narrative.
We’ve got this. And more importantly, they do too.
(Guest blogger: Kiana K. Wilson, Assistant Director of Law School Academic Support, University of Alabama School of Law)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Academic Support,
Wednesday, April 23, 2025
Updated: Thursday, April 24, 2025
|
Welcome to law school! This is a biweekly series with tips and tricks for success in law school. Although it’s billed toward new law students, I hope that every member of the law school community can find something helpful here.
Take a moment. Breathe. Look around. You made it.
In the whirlwind of outlines, cold calls, case briefs, and coffee-fueled study sessions, it’s easy to forget just how far you’ve come since your very first day of law school. But let’s pause for a second and give credit where it’s due: You’re doing something hard, and you’re doing it well.
Remember that first day? You may have walked into orientation wide-eyed, not quite knowing what “consideration” meant in contract law or why people kept saying “it depends.” Maybe you were nervous, maybe excited, maybe both. And now? You throw around terms like “mens rea” and “estoppel” like it’s no big deal. That’s growth. That’s progress.
Law school demands a lot. It asks you to think differently, write differently, be different. It challenges your confidence and your endurance. But here you are, showing up, learning, evolving. You’ve wrestled with tough concepts, pushed through imposter syndrome, and probably surprised yourself more than once.
Sure, there are days it felt overwhelming. Maybe even days you wondered if you were cut out for this. (Spoiler alert: You are.) The truth is, every 2L and 3L you see has stood right where you are. And they’ve made it through, just like you will.
So don’t wait for the “perfect” grade or the final exam to celebrate. Reflect now. Be proud now. Law school isn’t just about the destination. It’s about who you’re becoming along the way: a sharper thinker, a better writer, a stronger advocate.
And trust me, that first year? It’s a beast. But you’re taming it, one class, one case, one moment at a time.
You’ve come so far. Be proud of that.
It’s the final push of your 1L year. Keep going. You’ve got this.
(Dayna Smith)
Tags:
Encouragement & Inspiration
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Academic Support,
Friday, April 18, 2025
Updated: Thursday, April 24, 2025
|
The article "Embracing the New Academic Success: How Advising Using a Growth Mindset Can Enhance Law School Performance" by Titichia M. Jackson provides a timely and insightful framework for faculty and staff working in academic support roles. Drawing on the challenges and lessons of the COVID-19 pandemic, the article advocates for a shift from traditional, fixed-mindset methods of legal instruction and advising to more empathetic, flexible, and student-centered approaches. By adopting a growth mindset, educators can better meet the diverse learning needs of students, promote resilience, and foster inclusive learning environments that encourage self-assessment and continuous development. This piece serves as a valuable guide for reimagining academic success in legal education, making it especially relevant for those committed to improving outcomes and well-being for law students.
Tags:
Academic Support Spotlight
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|