|
|
Posted By Administration,
Friday, December 12, 2025
|
Continuing the tradition that seems to have emerged this week, I am going to build off Shane’s blog post and Amy’s blog post about how you can make the most of December—and wrap up the Fall semester with a bow.
A teaching challenge that I have encountered over the years comes from the on-off cycle. I teach a class one semester, but then I do not teach the same class in the next semester—sometimes maybe even for multiple semesters. So, for example, by the time I get around to preparing my Fall semester courses again I have forgotten some of the lessons that didn’t hit the way I wanted them to, or I forgot that I wanted to move things around. And just like we teach our students, the longer the time elapses between learning, the greater the chance of forgetting.
To avoid this lag and set yourself up for success, debrief your Fall semester courses now as you wrap up the semester and do final grading. Debriefing gives you an opportunity to ensure that you do not forget the things that went well or didn’t, and is used formally in military and corporate culture, and even in event planning.
Before I went to law school, I was an event planner and for some of our more major annual events, we would hold a debrief meeting the week or two after the meeting. All key planners, stakeholders, and team participants attended, and we were able to improve the event plan for the next year.
The same principles apply to us as instructors—even if we are a “team of one” when it comes to teaching our courses. Rather than waiting until just before we teach the course again, we can review now the assignments, lessons, notes we made in the margins of our teaching plans, and more to make a clear roadmap for adjustments for future semester. Doing this before the holidays and grading deadlines can also help you better prepare any Spring courses you will be teaching.
As students stop coming for support because they have begun to dive into their own final exams and before bar prep truly “kicks off” for the winter cycle, spend a purposeful hour or two making a short list of things you want to adjust in the classes you just finished teaching. Look at this as a self-reflecting exercise that can be done thoughtfully, but without a ton of pressure. Don’t let it overtake your schedule. But do allow it to take pressure off of future-you’s plate.
If you’re needing a list of helpful things to review in your course debrief, check out Dayna’s previous blog post on this topic.
Happy Wrapping!
(Erica M. Lux)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Thursday, December 11, 2025
|
As Shane Dizon noted in his earlier post, December is a time to mind your boundaries. As part of setting those boundaries, setting time aside to revamp your courses can fuel your inner creative educator.
This post shares a series of recent articles regarding incorporating AI into your syllabus or classroom.
If you have not already incorporated AI into your work, here are some questions to consider prior to the spring semester:
- How might you restrict the use of AI in your classroom?
- How and if you will use AI for your course? To grade? To generate hypotheticals? To assist in the creation of rubrics? Perhaps you will show illustrative examples of fact patterns through generative art?
- What methods might you use to teach responsible and ethical use of AI to future lawyers?
Regarding personally observed abuse of AI in academic and bar success courses:
- What might your approach be to a student that uses AI to generate essay responses in your course or in their commercial bar course (to presumably earn completion progress credit)?
While this blog does not have answers, it does have resources to consider this month:
- Lande, John, Solving Professors’ Dilemmas about Prohibiting or Promoting Student AI Use (December 01, 2025). University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2025-53, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5841522
- Lorteau, Steve and Sarro, Douglas, Artificial Intelligence in Legal Education: A Scoping Review (November 17, 2025). The Law Teacher [In Press], Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5762982
- Liu, Nathan, Artificial Intelligence in Legal Education: Current Practices, Debates, and Recommendations (November 05, 2025). JusGov Research Paper No. 2025-07, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5821163
- Sag, Matthew, AI Policies for Law Schools (October 17, 2025). Emory Legal Studies Research Paper No. 100, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5619534 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5619534
- Engle-Newman, Christopher, Assessing Law Student Learning in the Age of AI (September 05, 2025). U Denver Legal Studies Research Paper No. 25-24, 87 U. Pitt. L. Rev. XXX (2025), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5766523
- Lande, John, Getting Help from AI to Update Your Syllabus (Even If You Think It’s Just Fine) (July 09, 2025). University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2025-32, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5345304
I also hope to see many of you at NECASP in New York City on December 19th!
(Amy Vaughan-Thomas)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Sunday, December 7, 2025
|
Fellow ASPers – the familiar churn of the end-of-semester rush is upon us. We are seeing, hearing, and feeling the crush of student demand ahead of final exams – or perhaps we are artificially rushing to fill an engagement void that seems an ill-fitting claim before the storm. In either case, we almost reflexively rush to support our students in their days, hours, and minutes of greatest need. The door stays open, the meeting calendar expands to blowfish-size proportions, and the supplies of tissues and candy receive one more re-up.
At semester’s end, it can seem very selfish to center ourselves, and to preserve our boundaries rather than to artificially inflate our capacities. Yet this commitment to boundary maintenance has to be at its strongest when the demand is at its highest, and when the upper range of our students’ struggle is at its peak. As many wise ASPers have said over the years, this is like putting your oxygen mask on before helping others. (Which is an ironic thing for me to type 5 days before embarking on a 19-hour travel day across an ocean and a continent.)
My fellow blog contributors have more than set the stage this week with short, numbered lists of excellent advice. So I’ll try to do the same.
1. Further Codify Your Individual Meeting Protocol
If you’ve held out on a meeting scheduler – or new to ASP, and you missed how we kept that relic of pandemic-compelled remote learning for ourselves – create one. If you already have one, customize your landing page to reflect exactly when you’re available. Create a new meeting type to account for your time restrictions during this period – that yields data on how many requests you had that you should share with stakeholders. Put a sign on your door indicating your availability and including a QR code so they can easily schedule a meeting if no one is around to do so.
Have two out-of-offices messages cued up! The first is for the exam period indicating your reduced/limited availability (both to students and other non-student stakeholders). The second is for when exams are over, and you’re on break and/or entirely focused on February bar takers.
2. Better Returns on Investment: Change Drop-In/On-Call/Office Hours to Hall/Library Walks
Some of you may be constrained by an extremely big “Return to Office” culture.[1] But the truth of the hunkering down our students do means they very rarely stray from their preferred on-campus study spots (for those even still on campus). The on-call nature of just sitting in our offices prevents us from, say, engaging in something that requires deep work and also comes with semester’s end (reports, conference prep, work product assessment, advance planning for next semester or bar season).
So, let’s steal a page from our bar season playbook, and meet our students where they are literally and geographically at. In as short as a half-hour walk, we gain valuable insight in return: the mood on campus; the proportion of folks who prefer/need to be here to get their prep done versus off-premises; the responsiveness of our students to our presence. Our students appreciate the visible support. And we’ll need the walk to stave off all that terrible stuff that comes from being hunched over at a desk, looking at a screen, for far too long.
3. Triage: Who to See for What … Not “You, for Everything”
The substantive/skills divide becomes your biggest boundary patroller. Redirect a “teach me X, please” ambush to the doctrinal professor (not even the TAs – they have exams too); help your student re-frame how you can help them. Refer out anything your spidey senses are telling you is a larger quality of life issue to Student Life.[2] Make clear what answers you will/won’t answer. Include this triage policy, or links to it, in any weekly newsletter to students; share it with your doctrinal professors.
Have a reading/exam period checklist of self-remedies students should consult before seeing you. Require a study schedule as a condition of meeting. Re-direct the student to any accumulated resource bank, student portal page, or LMS page. This all encourages resourcefulness and self-assessment – exactly the skill that needs a leg-day-like boost, since they should be gorging on timed practice exams and sample answer review anyway.
4. Plan a Trip, A Pro Tip That Is Not a Joke
I recently talked to a friend of a bestie who wanted advice on moving, post-haste, to the country in which I currently reside.[3] I must’ve said at least five times during the video chat, and again in the follow-up e-mail, that he needed to book a scouting visit. Among other practical reasons for doing so, I reminded him that it would provide “needed inspiration and motivation when things will get challenging.” There is a terrible, terrible norm in American work culture – and in the legal profession in particular[4] – that taking a vacation is a self-centered affront to productivity, provider efficacy, and putting students first. And sadly, our employers almost unanimously make it clear they expect us on-call, year-round.[5]
But all that couldn’t be further from the truth. Taking care of you is taking care of everyone else. If we can, our goal should be to exhaust our vacation allotment every year. Not doing so intensifies the burnout effect – ask those whose jobs literally (not figuratively) are matters of life and death![6] Many of our present – and many of our now-former – colleagues in ASP can attest to that.
So now that I’ve scrambled your algorithm just by mentioning it, it’s up to you to do it. (Maybe … after booking your AASE travel.) Come back recharged, with fresh perspective on your plate’s challenges.
[1] There is mixed sentiment on the wisdom of this kind of mandate. See, e.g., Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic, “The Real Reasons Companies Are Forcing You Back To The Office,” Forbes.com (Mar. 8, 2025), available at https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomaspremuzic/2025/02/28/the-real-reasons-companies-are-forcing-you-back-to-the-office (last visited Dec. 4, 2025). My current location makes obvious into which camp I fall.
[2] It’s only fair that if we preach the expertise model as support that we should be trusted in all things learning science and bar exam, that we use that same norm to direct student life issues to the experts our institutions hired in student affairs. Admittedly, this line isn’t as clear when the ASP educator is also a student affairs professional.
[3] Still waiting for a first ASP friend to come visit over here! We promise excellent lodging and even more excellent gastronomy.
[4] See, e.g., Jordan Rothman, “Lawyers Have A Harder Time Taking Vacation Than Other Professionals,” Above the Law (Nov. 14, 2025), available at https://abovethelaw.com/2025/11/lawyers-have-a-harder-time-taking-vacation-than-other-professionals (last visited Dec. 4, 2025).
[5] Every year that I’ve done my presentation at NECASP for the national job posting data, I have not separate out how many openings specify the position is 9-10 months versus year-round; all of the postings check the latter box.
[6] Christine A. Sinsky, Mickey T. Trocke, Lotte N. Dyrbye, Hanhan Wang, Lindsey E. Carlasare, Colin P. West, Tait D. Shanafelt, “Vacation Days Taken, Work During Vacation, and Burnout Among U.S. Physicians”, JAMA Network Open, Vol. 7, No. 1 (Jan. 12, 2024), available at https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2813914 (last visited Dec. 4, 2025).
(Shane Dizon)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Sunday, December 7, 2025
|
You may have previously heard of the “Rule of 3s” in the context of writing—a literary technique that uses groups of three to help with narrative storytelling and remembering. I have even become of fan of using this in some of my previous blog posts on advice giving.
However, the Rule of 3 I want to talk about today is that in the context of law school institutional memory. Institutional memory can provide strength through culture loss prevention. Yet, it can also be weak or non-existent, as is sometimes the case with student organizations and journals. The Rule of 3 in law school relies primarily on institutional memory that develops based on the traditional law school term length of three years. After three years, you have an entirely new law student body. So how does this help academic and bar success programs?
For academic and bar success, we can use this Rule of 3 to our benefit because it has great value for programmatic change and innovation, which we are known for. Whether you are a rookie ASP/BP professional aiming to shift the culture of academic and bar success in your school, or a seasoned veteran trying a new program meant to drive engagement, the Rule of 3 in law school can help you successfully overcome challenges and implement successful programming.
Having worked as the events director at the law school, and then a law student, and now as an academic and bar success professional, I have seen this story many times—new deans and new visions, new administrative procedures and processes, and new programs and courses. Each time, there was initial resistance to the change, followed by some adaptations to improve it based on feedback, and then ultimately it became “just how things are.” The Rule of 3s really can work wonders for programmatic change within law schools.
And because what is a Rule of 3 lesson without three pieces of advice to take away, here are three ways that leaning into the Rule of 3 and law school institutional memory can help you implement your programs:
- Consistency. To be sure, when we try something that is not immediately successful, we may feel the natural instinct to scrap it and start over. Whether lack of immediate success is due to resistance (discussed below) or programmatic challenges, overcome this instinct to bail. Instead, know that the plan was developed soundly, continue to implement it with each new class, and evolve the program.
- Evolution. We may spend significant time planning new programs before implementing them, but that does not mean they are infallible. Instead, just as teaching a new course for the first time can make us aware of different or better ways to teach it next time, so can the implementation of a new program. Learn from the challenges (and feedback if you can get it!), and as you build consistency in bringing the program back each year, also improve it based on the lessons learned. Each new class of students teaches you something new about the program such that you can evolve it along the way.
- Resistance. Trying to implement something new, something people feel they do not want or do not need, will often meet resistance. Yet, as the classes change, so too does the amount of resistance you may face. In fact, it will likely start to wane as students grow more accustomed to it and then by the time your third class arrives, it is all anyone knows—and it is accepted.
While helpful in the writing context, the Rule of 3s as it specifically pertains to law students and law school institutional memory can improve the programmatic offerings in your academic and bar success programs. This can lead to long-term engagement, buy-in, and perhaps the positive results you seek!
(Erica M. Lux)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Sunday, December 7, 2025
|
Whenever final exams roll around, I find myself inundated with requests for study help. Students come to my office wanting detailed study plans and advice on how to make it all click before the exam. It can be easy to get bogged down in these meetings. Shouldn’t the students have been studying this whole semester? I don’t have a magic wand that can make a semester’s worth of knowledge make sense!
These requests make me pause and consider what law students actually need. Law students don’t need more willpower; they need smarter systems. Behavioral science shows that small, strategic “nudges” can dramatically improve how people learn, plan, and follow through. In Academic Support, nudges can help students study more consistently, avoid procrastination, and engage in deeper learning without feeling overwhelmed.
The best part? Nudges are subtle, simple, and require almost no extra time from students or faculty. Here are some nudges I suggest as students come to discuss study plans, no matter where we are in the semester.
1. The Implementation Intentions Nudge
Most students say things like: “I’ll study Evidence this week.” But behavioral research tells us that vague goals like this rarely lead to action. Instead, an implementation intention can spur students into action.
The base model for an implementation intention is: “On [day] at [time], I will study [topic] in [location].” So now, our vague “I’ll study Evidence this week” becomes “On Tuesday at 4pm, I will work on my Evidence outline in the library.” This provides students with a much more specific plan of attack.
2. The Two-Minute Starter Nudge: Reduce the Psychological Barrier
We all know that big tasks feel intimidating. Yet students often set lofty goals for themselves like “outline for two hours” then feel disappointed when they don’t meet those goals.
The two-minute rule starts by reframing the larger task as something too small to avoid. So rather than setting a goal to “outline for two hours,” students should instead tell themselves to “open your outline and update one case.” Then, once students start, momentum often kicks in. This nudge is especially effective for students who shut down when the work feels overwhelming.
3. The Commitment Device Nudge
People are more likely to follow through when they tell someone their plan. Implementing “commitment devices” are ways to capitalize on this. ASPs can help students use commitment devices by asking them to share their weekly study goal with a peer or mentor; offering a study check in form on Mondays and Fridays; and building micro-accountability into workshops (e.g., “before we leave, write one thing you’ll do this week and who you’ll tell”). The magic in this nudge is the social signal, rather than the work.
4. The Environment Nudge
Students often believe their habits are about motivation, but they may be more about environmental design. Students may not be setting themselves up for success because they’re trying to study in an environment not optimized for that purpose. Small nudges can help create a more productive environment:
- Encourage students to create a study-only spot even if it’s a corner of their apartment.
- Suggest phone baskets, website blockers, or do-not-disturb settings during deep work.
- Recommend that students set out books and laptops the night before to reduce friction.
- Encourage using visual cues in the study space to prompt action, such sticky notes and printed study plans.
When good habits are built into the environment, students won’t have to fight themselves to do the work.
5. The Pre-Commitment Calendar Nudge
This nudge encourages planning before stress hits. Planning in a calm state leads to better decisions than planning in moments of stress. ASP can nudge students to pre-commit to key tasks each week by encouraging weekly “study preview” meetings; sending weekly email reminders that includes planning templates; and encouraging time blocking. The goal here isn’t perfection; it’s proactivity.
6. The Reflection Nudge
Students often repeat ineffective habits simply because they don’t pause to evaluate them. Weekly reflection can help students understand what is and isn’t working for them. Sample prompts include:
- What study strategy worked best for me this week?
- What didn’t work, and why?
- What is one small change for next week?
Build reflection into workshops, coaching, or even quick end-of-class prompts to encourage this practice. Over time, students will realize that reflection turns experience into strategy.
Behavioral nudges aren’t about forcing students to work harder. They’re about helping students work smarter. When ASPs integrate small, science-backed prompts and advice into programming, students naturally build stronger habits, follow through more consistently, and develop the kind of sustainable study routines that lead to long-term success. A nudge may be small, but the cumulative effect can be transformative.
(Dayna Smith)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Thursday, November 20, 2025
|
Recently, as I applied for a tenure-track position, I struggled to put together a cover letter. For some reason, creating a cover letter for a faculty position was more difficult than the countless cover letters I had put together for jobs at firms as a law student. I had gone through several drafts, still not quite saying what I needed to say.
When a mentor reviewed my third cover letter draft, she said “I don’t know, it needs more specific facts.” And it hit me—I need to do more legal analysis!
As academic and bar success professionals, we are experts at good legal analysis and writing, especially in our ability to tie law and facts together—and to teach others to do so. And we should be using the same skills to write our own cover letters or review them for colleagues applying for faculty positions. So how do we do that?
- “Rules of Law” – Use the specific terms and phrases from the required and recommended qualifications in the relevant job posting as your rules of law—the key things you need to tie your experience and plans to. Faculty committees will use your cover letter and resume to see how well you meet the qualifications of the job posting. And just like a professor on an exam wants a student to state rules back to them before applying to facts, you should do the same for the committee members reviewing your application materials.
- Specific Facts – Use specific facts rather than generalizations to make your point that you are a good fit for the job. Have data? Use it. Have examples from class? Use them. Anything that can help you more specifically identify the ways in which you meet the rules of law—use them. Include at least two to three specific facts that help demonstrate how things you have accomplished meet each “rule of law” from the job posting.
- Tie Them Together – Make sure you are using good legal analysis to tie your “rules of law” to your specific facts. And don’t forget to because, which I am using here as a verb. Use “because” or other connection words like “therefore,” “when,” and “since” to show how you have specifically met the criteria for their job posting. Just like we tell students, show your math.
Use your expertise in legal analysis and set yourself up for an invite to the next stage of the interview process: the screening interview. Remember, we are masters of legal analysis skills—so why not showcase them?
(Erica M. Lux)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Thursday, November 20, 2025
|
As the end of the fall semester (and final exams!) sneaks up on us, I often pause to reflect on our efforts to support 1Ls from orientation to this point. Orientation is filled with energy, introductions, and information. This is especially true for first-generation law students who are stepping into a world shaped by unfamiliar norms, expectations, and vocabulary.
First-gen students are often on my mind when we reach the first midterms and especially when we are near the first set of final exams. Schools are increasingly recognizing the importance of welcoming first-gen students during those early days, but support doesn’t end when the nametags come off. Supporting first-gen students must be embedded throughout the entire law school experience, and Academic Support programs are uniquely positioned to lead this work. Here are a few strategies to help build first-gen supports into the full semester:
- Normalize the First-Gen Experience
First-gen students often carry invisible burdens like imposter syndrome, financial strains, and uncertainty about expectations. I often hear from first-gen students that they feel they’re navigating these feelings alone. Academic support professionals know that these feelings are not unique to first-gen students but are perhaps most keenly experienced by them. This makes normalizing this experience even more helpful to supporting first-gen students. Integrate first-gen stories and perspectives into workshops, panels, newsletters, faculty conversations, and alumni events. Additionally, celebrate first-gen achievements by highlighting first-gen graduate and faculty accomplishments. When first-gen students see their experiences reflected and honored, it lessens the sense of being “the only one.”
2. Demystify the “Hidden Curriculum”
Law school is full of assumptions about what students should already know. However, first-gen students usually don’t have access to that cultural knowledge, making them feel alone and behind those who can rely on lawyers in their families to share tips and tricks. Providing ongoing instruction on topics such as outlining, interpreting feedback, networking, and navigating summer job hiring cycles can help even the playing field. While all of these are not necessarily inherent to academic support programs, there are opportunities to collaborate across departments to support students’ holistic success. All of this should not just be one session, though; integrate it into courses, workshops, and small-group coaching throughout the semester for the greatest impact.
- Foster Community, Not Just Programming
Programming alone cannot fully support students because support is relational. Instead of just adding more formal programming, create opportunities for first-gen students to connect with faculty, alumni, upper-level students, and peers. Community combats isolation and builds the sense of belonging that directly supports retention and well-being.
Faculty should also be a part of this community. Faculty often want to support first-gen students, but they may not be sure how. Offer interested faculty short, actional strategies for clarifying expectations, demystifying assignments, inviting questions, and using inclusive teaching practices. When faculty reinforce support in the classroom, students see themselves as legitimate members of the academic community.
Supporting first-generation law students beyond orientation isn’t just an equity initiative. When students feel seen, supported, and empowered throughout their law school journey, they engage more deeply, persevere through challenges, and grow into confident, capable professionals. Academic support plays a vital role in that journey. By offering continuous guidance, demystifying the law school experience, and building community, academic support programs help first-gen law students not just enter law school, but thrive within it.
(Dayna Smith)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Friday, November 7, 2025
|
When schools talk about student retention, conversations often center on admissions metrics, financial aid, and student life. But one of the most powerful drivers of retention sits quietly at the heart of the institution. Academic support professionals don’t just help students learn legal doctrine. They help students belong, persist, and believe they can succeed. When that work is integrated into a school’s broader retention strategy, the impact can be transformative.
Students rarely leave law school because of a single bad grade. More often, attrition starts quietly with confusion, isolation, or discouragement. Academic support educators are often among the first to see the signs. By tracking early indicators, like missed assignments, disengagement, and repeated skill gaps, academic support programs can serve as the early warning system of the institution. Proactive outreach, coupled with partnerships across the institution, can turn early struggles into early recoveries.
Retention also has more depth than just academic mastery. It is often about emotional endurance. Law school tests identity as must as intellect, and academic support offers a uniquely safe space to teach students how to recover from setbacks, manage self-doubt, and reframe failure as feedback. Workshops and coaching on self-regulation, metacognition, and exam reflection don’t just improve grades; they build the grit that keeps students enrolled and engaged.
Ultimately, retention strategies thrive when decisions are both data-informed and human-centered. Academic support can lead the way by collecting meaningful data and interpreting it through a student-focused lens. Some data might include attendance trends, self-assessment results, and reflections surveys. Instead of just asking “who’s struggling,” we can ask: what patterns in our programming predict continued engagement? Which interventions most effectively rebuild student confidents? How do different groups experience our curriculum and culture? This deeper analysis helps schools invest resources where they’ll make the most difference.
Too often, academic support is framed as a safety net rather than a partner in institutional success. Academic support often occupies the middle ground between faculty, student affairs, and administration, making ASP teams powerful connectors. When academic support professionals share data and insights, they can help the institution align academics, wellness, and financial support around a common goal: student persistence.
Retention isn’t just about keeping students enrolled. It is about helping them flourish. Academic support professionals do this every day through mentoring, coaching, and teaching. When institutions recognize academic support programs as a central pillar of retention, they stop viewing it as a back-end intervention and start leveraging it as a front-line strategy for equity, engagement, and student success.
(Dayna Smith)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Friday, November 7, 2025
|
Preparing for finals doesn’t have to be scary!
One of my favorite ways to study for exams, especially as a 1L but even sometimes for some of my advanced required courses, was to analyze hypos in shows I was watching.
Whenever I studied (or now when I write), I struggled to do so in total silence—so I always had a show on that I had already watched enough times to not have to pay attention to it. One of those shows was Grey’s Anatomy. However, once I started law school and began learning things like Torts, Property, and Contracts, I found that Grey’s Anatomy had another benefit—hypos for me to practice for final exams with!
For example, there is an episode (S8:E23) where one of the residents, Alex Karev, who just accepted a full-time attending position at Seattle Grace Mercy West, gets offered a dream job at Johns Hopkins—so he tries to re-negotiate his contract. This was a great hypo for learning contract formation, validity, and defenses like Statute of Frauds.
In another episode (S8:E4), the doctors have to triage victims of a stampede from a comic con, where several nerds (and I say that supportively because I, myself identify as a nerd) are fighting over a TARDIS replica. This scenario (that lasts most of the episode) was great for me to test some of my personal property knowledge as I got ready for my Property exam.
There are lots of hypotheticals across subjects in Grey’s Anatomy—here are a few examples:
- Torts (plenty of fist fights and “apprehensions,” and of course LOTS of medical malpractice and battery)
- Criminal Law (battery, murder, fraud)
- Civil Procedure (they have a case that gets decided at summary judgment (S9:E11))
- Business Associations (after a horrific plane crash, many of the survivors form a new board of directors, which lasts several seasons, and includes decisions made by the board)
Of course, for criminal law and criminal procedure topics there are always a plethora of crime-based shows, including the many series of Law & Order and NCIS. If you’re curious, Reddit also has many of it’s own suggestions for show hypos across law school subjects.
So, as you get exam ready this fall—especially 1Ls who are always hungry for more practice problems—try to see if any of the shows or movies you’re currently watching help you to assess hypos. When you spot an issue, pause the show, write out or bullet point your rules and legal analysis, and then review it to see if you were on the right track. Bonus points if you and a friend do this together and help assess each other’s answers.
Happy Halloween & Happy Hypo-ing!
(Erica M. Lux)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Friday, October 24, 2025
|
Many legal educators are familiar with some of the challenges that neurodivergent law students face in managing their time, staying focused on productive studying, or being able to successfully complete an exam. For some neurodivergent law students, these challenges may be a life-long experience, especially where they may have been diagnosed neurodivergent as a child.
Though for others, the first time they may struggle is the LSAT or in law school. In fact, as legal educators, we can hear this sentiment a lot: “This is the first time I feel like I don’t know what I am doing.” And sometimes this conversation leads to the question of whether that student is neurodivergent (though that is not to suggest that question should be asked with every struggling student). This is because first-time academic struggle upon entering law school can occasionally indicate a previously undiagnosed neurodivergence.
Why might this occur? How does academic success prior to law school sometimes manifest in law school academic challenges and late diagnosed neurodivergence?
Consider how autism has been shown to be related to gifted and talented programming:
“Many masked Autistics are sent to gifted education as children, instead of being referred to disability services. [Their] apparent high intelligence puts [them] in a double bind: [they] are expected to accomplish great things to justify [their] oddness, and because [they] possess an enviable, socially prized quality [of good grades], it’s assumed [they] need less help than other people, not more.”[1]
There are other examples of this here and here. Being autistic (or neurodivergent) and “gifted” is commonly referred to as “Twice Exceptional.” Twice exceptional students may evade proper diagnoses due to their ability to achieve academically. Of course, challenges with poorly developed diagnostic tools (as many were developed with white, affluent, male samples), lack of access to funding for diagnosis, sociocultural norms that devalue disability, and masking so as to appear neurotypical are other reasons that increases in adult (late) diagnoses of neurodivergence may impact our law students. And, because academic struggle may not have been something a twice exceptional student has previously experienced, their first perceived failures in law school may shed light on the social value deposited solely to their ability to achieve good grades above all else.
By nature of their entering credentials, law students are generally high achievers. So, it would not be surprising that some masked autistic or neurodivergent law students who were never properly diagnosed are currently enrolled in law schools across the country. There are likely even practicing lawyers who may just now be realizing their neurodiversity as they experience significant burnout tied to heavy over-masking.
So, what happens when an underdiagnosed twice exceptional student graduates college, goes to law school, and starts to struggle academically for the first time?
First, we can refer students to proper counseling, diagnostic, and disability resources for support. As much as we may perceive signs of neurodiversity, we are (most of us) neither trained nor licensed to perform such assessments.
More importantly though, as legal educators in this space, we can remind students that everyone who graduates law school and passes the bar exam is an attorney at the end of the day. We can remind students that their academic success in law school does not define them, nor does it prohibit them from having a successful legal practice and future. Grades don’t make the lawyer; the ability to understand the law, apply it to the facts, and ethically resolve issues for clients—that’s what makes the lawyer.
And we can remind our neurodivergent students that when it comes to academic and bar support, we can help them come up with strategies to build the foundational lawyering skills necessary to improve their academic success and pass the bar exam.
(Erica M. Lux)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Friday, October 24, 2025
|
For those of us in academic and bar support, every bar exam cycle ends with a familiar ritual: the refresh of results pages, the email notifications, the sighs of relief, and sometimes, the heartbreak. The bar pass rate looms large, often treated as the single metric of program success. But as anyone in this work knows, success is far more complex than a percentage.
If we only measure outcomes by who passes, we risk overlooking the meaningful, transformative work that happens along the way. The bar exam is high-stakes, but it’s also a blunt instrument. It captures a snapshot of performance on one test under high stress. It doesn’t capture the student who entered law school underprepared and learned how to think critically, write analytically, and manage stress effectively. It doesn’t reflect the student who failed once, came back, and ultimately passed. When we define success only by the pass rate, we risk undervaluing growth, resilience, and the development of lifelong learning habits that will serve graduates far beyond exam day.
Instead of focusing solely on outcomes, programs can look to process metrics, which are the behaviors and skills associated with long-term success. For example, programs might looks to engagement with resources and faculty; skill development over the course of a student’s JD program; and behavioral changes like improving time management. Qualitative data tells one story, but qualitative data captures another. Asking students how confident they feel about tackling new challenges, how connected they feel to faculty, or how they’ve learned to recover from setbacks offers a fuller picture of academic and emotional growth. These data points reveal patterns of progress.
When we look beyond the pass rate, we can also ask better institutional questions. For instance, we might ask:
- What structural barriers affect student outcomes?
- How does our program design serve diverse learners?
- What interventions made the biggest difference in engagement?
A focus on deeper metrics turns “results” into research, helping schools refine strategies and promote equity.
Behind every data point is a student with a story. Celebrating the graduate who passed on the first try and the one who took a longer path honors the truth that success is iterative. Persistence, reflection, and continued effort are victories in themselves.
The pass rate matters—it’s one measure of how effectively we’ve prepared students for licensure. But it’s not the only measure. As academic and bar support professionals, our work isn’t just about producing passing scores; it’s about cultivating confident, capable professionals who know how to learn, adapt, and persevere. When we measure success by growth, engagement, and resilience, we tell a more accurate story of what success in legal education truly looks like.
(Dayna Smith)
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Thursday, October 16, 2025
|
Self-regulated learning[1] is a valuable tool that many law students should learn in their first year. While some may already have this skill upon entering law school, others will learn how to self-regulate their learning as part of a first-year skills course. On the other hand, other students may struggle with this. Some students who work with academic and bar support educators, whether voluntarily or as part of a mandated program, often need assistance in developing their ability to self-regulate their learning.
As academic and bar success educators, we can help law students build this skill more purposefully in our student meetings. In practice, it requires us to resist the urge to prescribe tasks a student should complete prior to a follow-up meeting. Instead, to allow a student more actively participate in their own learning, we should simply ask: “What would you like to prepare for me next week?”
By shifting the responsibility for evaluation and planning to the student, the student learner is able to more actively engage with self-regulated learning. Students who do this can also better implement this learning strategy outside of the guided academic meeting environment. It also helps them develop a growth mindset because once they (perhaps with your help) have identified a learning challenge, they establish the mindset that it can be remedied and create the plan to do so. Doing this allows the student to take one more step closer to being an expert learner, capable of law school and bar exam success—and future practice success.
Not only does this approach support law student learning, but it also reduces the mental load you, as an academic or bar success educator, manage. Rather than having to determine what a student can and cannot accomplish yet based on where they are in course work or hoping they will complete the task they may not want to, you shift the onus off of you and back onto them. (Afterall, you have completed law school and passed the bar exam—that’s now their task.)
Plus, when a student decides what they want to bring to the next meeting, I find they are also more likely to accomplish the task. They did not get told to do something; they came up with the task and know they can do it because they told you they could. And because you did not have to come up with the task, it also provides a great opening for your next meeting: “Remind me what you planned to accomplish today and let me know how that went.”
Our students are adults learning a profession. Even as educators, we cannot always give them the answers (nor should we); the ability to find the answer and execute the solution is something they are capable of doing. And by shifting your mindset in student meetings, you’re also helping them to realize the tools that will help make them expert life-long learners.
(Erica M. Lux)
[1] Self-regulated learning is a skill that requires the learner to assess and plan, implement the plan while monitoring progress towards a goal, and evaluate the success of the plan before starting the cycle over again. See this great article by Michael Hunter Schwartz on Self-Regulated Learning: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=959467.
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Thursday, October 16, 2025
|
Processing an unsuccessful bar exam outcome necessitates a grieving process. But unfortunately, in response to institutional and ABA standard demands, we may turn too quickly to offering repeat taker programming without creating space for the taker to process their grief.
If we don’t create the space for students to grieve then we merely serve to reinforce the increased stress, anxiety and mental health challenges in our profession. The article, “Managing Stress, Grief, and Mental Health Challenges in the Legal Profession; Not Your Usual Law Review Article” by Deborah Rhodes begins with reference to a true story from the book Smacked.[1] The account details the death and funeral of a partner at a Silicon Valley firm. His life lost due to complications from substance abuse. While a young associate gave remarks at his funeral, many of the lawyers in attendance were on their phones, reading and tapping emails. A clear example that in the most important time for grief, lawyers are inclined, and perhaps programmed, to operate “business as usual.”
Support for an unsuccessful bar taker requires more than “business as usual” – repeater support programming, commercial provider free repeat courses, and supplemental study programs. This is our moment to work with the graduate to process the grief as part of the pathway to success. In a world where access to sustained mental health resources and counseling support is limited, we must fill this void when our graduates grappling with unsuccessful outcomes.
To institute good grief, here are some practical exercises to consider:
1. Engage the student in a perspective analysis.[2] Push the graduate to reframe their circumstances, explore their gratitude and compare their circumstance to a more challenging (and worse) life circumstance that they are not currently experiencing. This practice helps minimize the weight of the negative outcome.
2. Help the student identify an activity that they currently engage in or that they want to engage in that contributes to something more than themselves.[3] This exercise promotes well-being, brings fulfillment, and externalizes focus.
3. Identify key future deadlines in the overall “life” agenda. By mapping out the reality of the circumstance and intentionally incorporating time for grief, it can bring ease to the inherent tendency our graduates have to “study right away” after experiencing a bar exam loss. A “life” agenda generates opportunity for sustained achievement of short-term goals during the grieving process – which is more likely to yield long term success.
(Amy Vaughan-Thomas)
[1] Deborah L. Rhode, Managing Stress, Grief, and Mental Health Challenges in the Legal Profession; Not Your Usual Law Review Article, 89 Fordham L. Rev. 2565, 2566 (2021) (citing EILENE ZIMMERMAN, SMACKED (2020); Eilene Zimmerman, The Lawyer, The Addict, N.Y. TIMES (July 15, 2017), https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/15/business/lawyersaddiction-mental-health.html [https://perma.cc/N4MH-LXYR].
[2] Id. at 2573.
[3] Id.
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Friday, October 10, 2025
|
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Monday, October 6, 2025
|
Backlash against the unknown or lesser known is nothing new. Neurodiversity, particularly autism, has come under recent scrutiny and received significant backlash due to outdated stereotypes and misinformation.[1] However, this viewpoint of autism, and neurodiversity in general, is misguided.
Autistic persons can be—and are—thoughtful, smart, and empathetic. Some even work within the legal academy or in practice.[2] But being autistic or neurodivergent means learning how to navigate the challenges we face while also understanding some of our own strengths.
As a late-diagnosed neurodivergent adult, some days I still struggle to accept parts of myself when I face challenges. Other days it is so evident who I am (and have always been) that I cannot help but to clearly see how a specific strength has manifested positively at work or in life.
Understanding the strengths and challenges that our neurodivergent law students face requires us to look at the surrounding context. “Context is key . . . because in one situation, one set of traits can be highly beneficial and in another situation, those same traits can be ‘crippling.’”[3] One neurodivergent law student may be strong at performing under timed pressure, such as on exams, and may be otherwise challenged by communicating effectively with neurotypical judges and witnesses in moot court or mock trial experiences. Another neurodivergent law student may have the opposite strengths and challenges. Neither of these things, however, mean that the student will not be able to succeed in law school or even in practice. Instead, we need extra support,[4] therapy,[5] training,[6] or mentorship[7] to better manage our challenges, build new skills, and find our personal path to successful practice.[8]
Doing so sets neurodivergent law students up for success as they learn to lean into their strengths and how to better support the challenges they face. “For most, [autism] is an endless fight against schools, workplaces, and bullies. But under the right circumstances, give the right adjustment, it CAN be a superpower.”[9] As legal educators who have neurodivergent students in our halls, we need to reframe how we talk about neurodiversity broadly, and autism specifically, especially given the recent problematic framing that has been repeated in more public spheres.[10]
Reframing how we talk about neurodiversity into a spectrum of strengths and challenges is important for our neurodivergent law students in several ways. For one, it helps pivot incorrect narratives, driven by the medical model of understanding neurodiversity, that all neurodivergent adults are incapable of being productive members of society because something is “wrong” with us.[11] It also helps one to empathize more with neurodivergent persons to understand that just like a neurotypical person may have good and bad days, more- and less-productive days, we similarly struggle—just doing so with fewer spoons[12] to get us through the day. Finally, it helps us to recognize that neurodivergent people are everywhere around us.
No single one of us is more or less valuable[13] because of what contributions we can or cannot offer to a society that was not built with us in mind. We each have strengths and challenges that we face based on how our neurodivergence presents, but that doesn’t necessarily make us a superhero—it makes us a person equally owed respect and consideration.
(Erica Lux)
[1] Jen Christensen, Brenda Goodman, & Meg Tirrell, Trump Links Autism to Acetaminophen Use During Pregnancy, Despite Decades of Evidence It’s Safe, CNN (Sept. 23, 2025), https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/22/health/trump-autism-announcement-cause-tylenol; but see Ashley Bell, What Causes Autism? Is Autism Genetic or Environmental?, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine (April 10, 2024),https://medschool.ucla.edu/news-article/is-autism-genetic (stating that up to 1,000 genes and inherited genetic mutations mostly impact autism susceptibility, while prenatal exposure to certain environmental elements are relatively rare in indicating autism). Increases in rates of autism are due to a number of factors, including “awareness, testing, and diagnoses [that] have evolved to capture patients that were previously unrecognized or diagnosed with something different—not so much because instances of autism have actually increased.” Bell, supra note 1.
[2] See, e.g., Haley Moss, Who I Am?, Haley Moss, https://haleymoss.com/about/ (last visited Oct. 1, 2025); Riley Roliff, Queer, Autistic, Empowering: An Ohio Law Professor Busts Norms & Transforms the Classroom, The Buckeye Flame (June 9, 2023), https://thebuckeyeflame.com/2023/06/09/queer-autistic-empowering-csu-law-professor/; Joel Brown, A Very Different Path to Excellence, BU Today (May 16, 2017), https://www.bu.edu/articles/2017/gary-lawson-metcalf-award-for-excellence-in-teaching/; Ian Karbal, Pennsylvania’s Autistic Lawmakers Condemn Trump-Kennedy Approach to the Disorder, Penn. Capital-Star (Sept. 24, 2025),https://penncapital-star.com/health/pennsylvanias-autistic-lawmakers-condemn-trump-kennedy-approach-to-the-disorder/; Peter O’Neil, My So-Called ‘Disorder’ Made Me a Better Attorney, Seattle Times (May 12, 2023), https://www.seattletimes.com/opinion/my-so-called-disorder-made-me-a-better-attorney/. I am also a neurodivergent attorney and legal educator.
[3] Jenara Nerenberg, Divergent Mind: Thriving in a World That Wasn’t Designed for You 72 (2020) (quoting Harvard neurologist Joel Salinas as to whether being neurodivergent is a gift, curse, or none of the above).
[4] See e.g., Katherine Silver Kelly, Be Curious Not Judgmental: Neurodiversity in Legal Education, 78(2) Ark. L. Rev. (2025).
[5] See e.g., Barbara L. Kornblau & Scott Michael Robertson, Guest Editorial: Special Issue on Occupational Therapy with Neurodivergent People, 75(3) Am. J. of Occupational Therapy (2021).
[6] See e.g., Sarah Schlossberg, ADHD and Me: Strategies for Lawyers with Executive Functioning Challenges, 68 Prac. Law. 3 (April 2022).
[7] See e.g., Bill Wong et al., The Importance of Neurodivergent Mentorship for the Development of Professional Identity, 6(1) Neuroscience Rsch. Notes 167 (2023).
[8] See e.g., Stephanie Francis Ward, For Lawyers with Autism, the Work Often Pairs Up with Things They Do Well, ABA J. (Apr. 22, 2019, 6:30 AM CDT),https://www.abajournal.com/web/article/for-lawyers-with-autism-the-work-often-pairs-up-with-things-they-do-well.
[9] Maija Kappler, Greta Thunberg Opens Up About Her Asperger’s Syndrome, HuffPost (Sept. 19, 2019), https://www.huffpost.com/archive/ca/entry/greta-thunberg-aspergers_ca_5d6c2d31e4b09bbc9ef0e7db (quoting activist Greta Thunberg).
[10] Bethany Braun-Silva, RFK Jr.’s Comments on Autism Draw Reactions from Parents & Experts, ABCNews (Apr. 17, 2025), https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Wellness/parents-experts-react-rfk-jrs-autism-claims/story?id=120911306 (pushing back on Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s problematic comments that autism “destroys families” and autistic children will never be productive or have meaningful relationships); Karbal, supra note 2.
[11] Haley Moss, Great Minds Think Differently: Neurodiversity for Lawyers & Other Professionals 9–13 (2021).
[12] Megan Anna Neff, Spoon Theory for Autism & ADHD: The Neurodivergent Spoon Drawer, Neurodivergent Insights (July 13, 2022), https://neurodivergentinsights.com/the-neurodivergent-spoon-drawer-spoon-theory-for-adhders-and-autists/.
[13] Being a productive member of society is not what gives someone value; being a human being, a person, is what gives someone value.
This post has not been tagged.
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|